{"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2","cveMetadata":{"cveId":"CVE-2025-8715","assignerOrgId":"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007","state":"PUBLISHED","assignerShortName":"PostgreSQL","dateReserved":"2025-08-07T16:39:47.692Z","datePublished":"2025-08-14T13:00:07.753Z","dateUpdated":"2026-02-26T17:48:36.521Z"},"containers":{"cna":{"providerMetadata":{"orgId":"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007","shortName":"PostgreSQL","dateUpdated":"2025-08-14T13:00:07.753Z"},"title":"PostgreSQL pg_dump newline in object name executes arbitrary code in psql client and in restore target server","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"Improper neutralization of newlines in pg_dump in PostgreSQL allows a user of the origin server to inject arbitrary code for restore-time execution as the client operating system account running psql to restore the dump, via psql meta-commands inside a purpose-crafted object name.  The same attacks can achieve SQL injection as a superuser of the restore target server.  pg_dumpall, pg_restore, and pg_upgrade are also affected.  Versions before PostgreSQL 17.6, 16.10, 15.14, 14.19, and 13.22 are affected.  Versions before 11.20 are unaffected.  CVE-2012-0868 had fixed this class of problem, but version 11.20 reintroduced it."}],"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"PostgreSQL","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"lessThan":"17.6","status":"affected","version":"17","versionType":"rpm"},{"lessThan":"16.10","status":"affected","version":"16","versionType":"rpm"},{"lessThan":"15.14","status":"affected","version":"15","versionType":"rpm"},{"lessThan":"14.19","status":"affected","version":"14","versionType":"rpm"},{"lessThan":"13.22","status":"affected","version":"11.20","versionType":"rpm"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","cweId":"CWE-93","type":"CWE","description":"Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')"}]}],"references":[{"url":"https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2025-8715/"}],"metrics":[{"format":"CVSS","cvssV3_1":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","baseScore":8.8,"baseSeverity":"HIGH"}}],"configurations":[{"lang":"en","value":"attacker can direct pg_dump to a chosen origin server or has permission to create non-temporary objects in at least one schema that pg_dump will export"}],"workarounds":[{"lang":"en","value":"To block attacks against the psql client, use \"pg_restore --dbname\" instead of restore methods that involve \"psql\".  To block SQL injection against the restore target server, revoke the CREATE permission from non-superusers at the origin server."}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","value":"The PostgreSQL project thanks Noah Misch for reporting this problem."}]},"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"type":"ssvc","content":{"id":"CVE-2025-8715","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2025-08-15T03:55:57.753539Z"}}}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment","providerMetadata":{"orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP","dateUpdated":"2026-02-26T17:48:36.521Z"}}]}}