{"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2","cveMetadata":{"cveId":"CVE-2025-64529","assignerOrgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","state":"PUBLISHED","assignerShortName":"GitHub_M","dateReserved":"2025-11-05T21:15:39.401Z","datePublished":"2025-11-10T22:28:51.589Z","dateUpdated":"2025-11-12T20:12:52.552Z"},"containers":{"cna":{"title":"SpiceDB's WriteRelationships fails silently if payload is too big","problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-770","lang":"en","description":"CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling","type":"CWE"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"LOW","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":2.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U","version":"4.0"}}],"references":[{"name":"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/security/advisories/GHSA-pm3x-jrhh-qcr7","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/security/advisories/GHSA-pm3x-jrhh-qcr7"}],"affected":[{"vendor":"authzed","product":"spicedb","versions":[{"version":"< 1.45.2","status":"affected"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"orgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","shortName":"GitHub_M","dateUpdated":"2025-11-10T22:28:51.589Z"},"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"SpiceDB is an open source database system for creating and managing security-critical application permissions. In versions prior to 1.45.2, users who use the exclusion operator somewhere in their authorization schema; have configured their SpiceDB server such that `--write-relationships-max-updates-per-call` is bigger than 6500; and issue calls to WriteRelationships with a large enough number of updates that cause the payload to be bigger than what their datastore allows; will receive a successful response from their `WriteRelationships` call, when in reality that call failed, and receive incorrect permission check results, if those relationships had to be read to resolve the relation involving the exclusion. Version 1.45.2 contains a patch for the issue. As a workaround, set `--write-relationships-max-updates-per-call` to `1000`."}],"source":{"advisory":"GHSA-pm3x-jrhh-qcr7","discovery":"UNKNOWN"}},"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"type":"ssvc","content":{"timestamp":"2025-11-12T17:34:00.745696Z","id":"CVE-2025-64529","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment","providerMetadata":{"orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP","dateUpdated":"2025-11-12T20:12:52.552Z"}}]}}