{"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2","cveMetadata":{"cveId":"CVE-2025-10158","assignerOrgId":"9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7","state":"PUBLISHED","assignerShortName":"rapid7","dateReserved":"2025-09-09T11:15:17.585Z","datePublished":"2025-11-18T14:24:19.210Z","dateUpdated":"2025-11-19T16:48:56.591Z"},"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"rsync","vendor":"rsync","versions":[{"lessThanOrEqual":"3.4.1","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"}]}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Calum Hutton"}],"datePublic":"2025-11-18T14:20:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"A malicious client acting as the receiver of an rsync file transfer can trigger an out of bounds read of a heap based buffer, via a negative array index. The \n\nmalicious \n\nrsync client requires at least read access to the remote rsync module in order to trigger the issue."}],"value":"A malicious client acting as the receiver of an rsync file transfer can trigger an out of bounds read of a heap based buffer, via a negative array index. The \n\nmalicious \n\nrsync client requires at least read access to the remote rsync module in order to trigger the issue."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":4.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-129","description":"CWE-129 Improper Validation of Array Index","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"orgId":"9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7","shortName":"rapid7","dateUpdated":"2025-11-18T14:45:58.065Z"},"references":[{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/commit/797e17fc4a6f15e3b1756538a9f812b63942686f"},{"tags":["technical-description"],"url":"https://attackerkb.com/assessments/fbacb2a6-d1cd-4011-bb3a-f06b1c8306b1"}],"source":{"discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"timeline":[{"lang":"en","time":"2025-03-19T06:11:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 makes initial outreach to rsync maintainers"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-03-19T10:04:00.000Z","value":"Rsync maintainers confirm outreach"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-03-20T10:34:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 provides rsync maintainers a technical writeup and PoC to reproduce the issue"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-04-02T03:05:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 requests confirmation of findings"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-04-06T09:30:00.000Z","value":"Rsync maintainers indicate more time is needed"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-04-16T05:31:00.000Z","value":"Rsync maintainers reproduce the issue and dispute its security impact due to uncertainty around viability of heap manipulation during exploitation"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-04-17T01:56:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 indicates manipulating the heap is nuanced and CVE assignment is both prudent and best practice in this instance"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-05-07T09:08:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 requests an update"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-05-12T06:08:00.000Z","value":"Rsync maintainers indicate a pull request to fix the issue is forthcoming"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-05-28T09:40:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 requests an update"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-06-17T04:19:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 requests an update"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-08-18T11:59:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 requests an update"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-08-23T09:17:00.000Z","value":"Rsync maintainers indicate a pull request to remediate the issue has been made and a feature release is forthcoming"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-09-02T04:23:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 indicates intention to assign a CVE and perform a coordinated disclosure with the rsync maintainers upon the upcoming feature release"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-09-09T11:18:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 provides rsync maintainers a reserved CVE identifier and requests the date for the expected feature release"},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-11-11T04:42:00.000Z","value":"Rapid7 indicates intention to publish the CVE record on November 18, 2025."},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-11-18T14:00:00.000Z","value":"This disclosure"}],"title":"Rsync: Out of bounds array access via negative index","x_generator":{"engine":"Vulnogram 0.5.0"}},"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"type":"ssvc","content":{"timestamp":"2025-11-19T16:15:02.998218Z","id":"CVE-2025-10158","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment","providerMetadata":{"orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP","dateUpdated":"2025-11-19T16:48:56.591Z"}}]}}