{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"n/a","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"n/a"}]}],"datePublic":"2012-11-02T00:00:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"ppm2tiff does not check the return value of the TIFFScanlineSize function, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PPM image that triggers an integer overflow, a zero-memory allocation, and a heap-based buffer overflow."}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"n/a","lang":"en","type":"text"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2017-08-28T12:57:01.000Z","orgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","shortName":"redhat"},"references":[{"name":"DSA-2575","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_DEBIAN"],"url":"http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2575"},{"name":"86878","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_OSVDB"],"url":"http://www.osvdb.org/86878"},{"tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871700"},{"name":"[oss-security] 20121102 libtiff: Missing return value check in ppm2tiff leading to heap-buffer overflow when reading a tiff file","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/3"},{"name":"56372","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_BID"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56372"},{"name":"USN-1631-1","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_UBUNTU"],"url":"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1631-1"},{"name":"openSUSE-SU-2013:0187","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_SUSE"],"url":"http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00076.html"},{"name":"libtiff-ppm2tiff-bo(79750)","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_XF"],"url":"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79750"},{"name":"[oss-security] 20121102 Re: libtiff: Missing return value check in ppm2tiff leading to heap-buffer overflow when reading a tiff file","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/7"},{"name":"51133","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_SECUNIA"],"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/51133"},{"name":"RHSA-2012:1590","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_REDHAT"],"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1590.html"}]},"adp":[{"providerMetadata":{"orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","shortName":"CVE","dateUpdated":"2024-08-06T20:42:54.686Z"},"title":"CVE Program Container","references":[{"name":"DSA-2575","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_DEBIAN","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2575"},{"name":"86878","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_OSVDB","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.osvdb.org/86878"},{"tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred"],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871700"},{"name":"[oss-security] 20121102 libtiff: Missing return value check in ppm2tiff leading to heap-buffer overflow when reading a tiff file","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/3"},{"name":"56372","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_BID","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56372"},{"name":"USN-1631-1","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_UBUNTU","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1631-1"},{"name":"openSUSE-SU-2013:0187","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_SUSE","x_transferred"],"url":"http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00076.html"},{"name":"libtiff-ppm2tiff-bo(79750)","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_XF","x_transferred"],"url":"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79750"},{"name":"[oss-security] 20121102 Re: libtiff: Missing return value check in ppm2tiff leading to heap-buffer overflow when reading a tiff file","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/7"},{"name":"51133","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_SECUNIA","x_transferred"],"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/51133"},{"name":"RHSA-2012:1590","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_REDHAT","x_transferred"],"url":"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1590.html"}]}]},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","assignerShortName":"redhat","cveId":"CVE-2012-4564","datePublished":"2012-11-11T11:00:00.000Z","dateReserved":"2012-08-21T00:00:00.000Z","dateUpdated":"2024-08-06T20:42:54.686Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.1"}