{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"n/a","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"n/a"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"n/a","lang":"en","type":"text"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z","orgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","shortName":"redhat"},"references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"},{"name":"20120703 Cyberoam advisory","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"],"url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}],"tags":["disputed"],"x_legacyV4Record":{"CVE_data_meta":{"ASSIGNER":"secalert@redhat.com","ID":"CVE-2012-3372","STATE":"PUBLIC"},"affects":{"vendor":{"vendor_data":[{"product":{"product_data":[{"product_name":"n/a","version":{"version_data":[{"version_value":"n/a"}]}}]},"vendor_name":"n/a"}]}},"data_format":"MITRE","data_type":"CVE","data_version":"4.0","description":{"description_data":[{"lang":"eng","value":"** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\""}]},"problemtype":{"problemtype_data":[{"description":[{"lang":"eng","value":"n/a"}]}]},"references":{"reference_data":[{"name":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"},{"name":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"},{"name":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"},{"name":"20120703 Cyberoam advisory","refsource":"BUGTRAQ","url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"},{"name":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}]}}},"adp":[{"providerMetadata":{"orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","shortName":"CVE","dateUpdated":"2024-08-06T20:05:12.354Z"},"title":"CVE Program Container","references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"},{"name":"20120703 Cyberoam advisory","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ","x_transferred"],"url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}]},{"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"type":"CWE","lang":"en","description":"CWE-noinfo Not enough information"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"scope":"UNCHANGED","version":"3.1","baseScore":7.4,"attackVector":"NETWORK","baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","integrityImpact":"HIGH","userInteraction":"NONE","attackComplexity":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"other":{"type":"ssvc","content":{"timestamp":"2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z","id":"CVE-2012-3372","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment","providerMetadata":{"orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP","dateUpdated":"2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z"}}]},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","assignerShortName":"redhat","cveId":"CVE-2012-3372","datePublished":"2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z","dateReserved":"2012-06-14T00:00:00.000Z","dateUpdated":"2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.1"}