{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"n/a","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"n/a"}]}],"datePublic":"2006-03-19T00:00:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\""}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"n/a","lang":"en","type":"text"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2018-10-18T14:57:01.000Z","orgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","shortName":"mitre"},"references":[{"name":"20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded"},{"tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763"},{"name":"20060418 RE: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded"},{"name":"20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896"},{"name":"20060417 gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded"},{"name":"[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug c/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549&r2=112698&pathrev=112698&diff_format=h"},{"name":"[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug middle-end/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html"}],"x_legacyV4Record":{"CVE_data_meta":{"ASSIGNER":"cve@mitre.org","ID":"CVE-2006-1902","STATE":"PUBLIC"},"affects":{"vendor":{"vendor_data":[{"product":{"product_data":[{"product_name":"n/a","version":{"version_data":[{"version_value":"n/a"}]}}]},"vendor_name":"n/a"}]}},"data_format":"MITRE","data_type":"CVE","data_version":"4.0","description":{"description_data":[{"lang":"eng","value":"fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\""}]},"problemtype":{"problemtype_data":[{"description":[{"lang":"eng","value":"n/a"}]}]},"references":{"reference_data":[{"name":"20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","refsource":"BUGTRAQ","url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded"},{"name":"http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763","refsource":"CONFIRM","url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763"},{"name":"20060418 RE: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","refsource":"BUGTRAQ","url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded"},{"name":"20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","refsource":"BUGTRAQ","url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded"},{"name":"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896"},{"name":"20060417 gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","refsource":"BUGTRAQ","url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded"},{"name":"[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug c/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html"},{"name":"http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549&r2=112698&pathrev=112698&diff_format=h","refsource":"CONFIRM","url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549&r2=112698&pathrev=112698&diff_format=h"},{"name":"[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug middle-end/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html"}]}}},"adp":[{"providerMetadata":{"orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","shortName":"CVE","dateUpdated":"2024-08-07T17:27:29.536Z"},"title":"CVE Program Container","references":[{"name":"20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded"},{"tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred"],"url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763"},{"name":"20060418 RE: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded"},{"name":"20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896"},{"name":"20060417 gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded"},{"name":"[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug c/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred"],"url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549&r2=112698&pathrev=112698&diff_format=h"},{"name":"[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug middle-end/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html"}]}]},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","assignerShortName":"mitre","cveId":"CVE-2006-1902","datePublished":"2006-04-20T10:00:00.000Z","dateReserved":"2006-04-20T00:00:00.000Z","dateUpdated":"2024-08-07T17:27:29.536Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.1"}